“Send the Archers”: Archery’s Primary Role in Canaanite-Levantine Military Thought“Enviar a los arqueros”: el rol central de la arquería en el pensamiento militar cananeo-levantino

Autores/as

  • James Bowden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53351/ruhm.v9i19.689

Palabras clave:

Amarna Letters , Archery, Canaan, Egypt, Chariots

Resumen

This article explores the importance and reliance that rulers in the Canaanite – Levantine region attached to archery during the Amarna period. It argues that the Amarna Letter correspondence of these kings reveals a dependency on archery that was unmatched by Egypt and that was unique, especially in this period. The title phrase of the article or some form of it, “send the archers” is found in the Amarna Letters 84 times. The article demonstrates how this was an exceptional number of requests which far exceeded any request for any other form of military weapon assistance, including troops or chariots, which was minimal and often asked for until archers could arrive. The article examines several representative Amarna letters, both from the International correspondence of the kings outside of Canaan and the Levant and those in Canaan and the Levant, and uses these to demonstrate the contrast between the Canaanite king’s perception and that of the Egyptians and those outside of the region in regards to the use of archers. The examination considers both sides of the correspondence as well as touching on the importance that chariotry had in New Kingdom Egyptian military philosophy and how it came to eclipse other forms of military arms. The article looks at annals, iconographic and orthostatic representations of Egyptian military campaigns to demonstrate that there was a preponderance of reliance on the chariot in the Egyptian military mentality that was not shared by the Canaanites or the Levantine rulers. Canaanite kings sought after the protection of Pharaohs Amenophis III and Amenophis IV (also known as Akhenaten) archers and regularly sent requests asking for their support in facing down an invasion or insurrection of the ‘Apiru. These requests were heavily biased in language and construction towards an emphasis on archers as opposed to charioteers or infantry.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Philippe ABRAHAMI: “Les lettres de la correspondence d'El-Amarna expédiées depuis l'Oronte”, SYRIA. Archéologie, Art et Histoire, 4 (2016), pp. 119-135.

Archer, Christon. et al. World History of Warfare. Lincoln: University of Nebraska, 2002.

Charvat, Petr Petra Mařikova Vlčkova eds. Who Was King? Who Was Not King? The Rulers and the Ruled in the Ancient Near East. Prague: Institute of Archaeology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 2010.

Cook, S.L. Variability and Change in Ancient Egyptian Archery Technology. University of Liverpool. Unpublished dissertation. Embargo until 2024.

Finkelstein, Israel Yuval Goren and Nadav Na’aman. Inscribed in Clay: Provenance Study of the Amarna Letters and other Ancient Near Eastern Texts. University of Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv, 2004.

Gevirtz, Stanley, "Evidence of Conjugational Variation in the Parallelization of Selfsame Verbs in the Amarna Letters," Journal of Near Eastern Studies 32, no. 1/2 (1973): 99-104.

Hamblin, William J. Warfare in the Ancient Near East to 1600 BC.: Holy Warriors at the Dawn of History. New York: Routledge, 2006.

Holmes, Y. Lynn, "The Messengers of the Amarna Letters," Journal of the American Oriental Society 95, no. 3 (1975): 376-81.

Izre’el, Shlomo and Itamar Singer. The General’s Letter from Ugarit: A Linguistic and Historical Re-Evaluation of RS 20.33 (Ugaritic V, No. 20). Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University, 1990.

Knudtzon, J.A. Die El-Amarna-Tafeln, mit Einleitung und Erläuterungen. Bd.1: Die Texte. Bd. 2: Anmerkungen und Register (Anmerkungen und Register bearbeitet von Otto Weber und Erich Ebeling. 1915).

Liverani, Mario. Le Letter di El-Amarna. Brescia: Paideia Editrice, 1998.

Moran, William, W.F. Albright. “A Re-Interpretation of an Amarna Letter from Byblos (EA82)” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 2, No. 4 (1948): 239-248

Moran, William. The Amarna Letters. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.

Morris, Ellen F., "Bowing and Scraping in the Ancient Near East: An Investigation into Obsequiousness in the Amarna Letters," Journal of Near Eastern Studies 65, no. 3 (2006): 179-96.

Niebuhr, Carl. The Tell El Amarna Period: The Relations of Egypt and Western Asia in the Fifteenth Century B.C. According to the Tell El Amarna Tablets. London: David Nutt, 1903.

Osborne, Grant R. The Hermeneutical Spiral: A Comprehensive Introduction to Biblical Interpretation. Dowers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1991.

Scheidewind, William M. ed. Trans. A.F. Rainey. The El-Amarna Correspondence. Leiden: Brill, 2015.

Seevers, Boyd. Warfare in the Old Testament: The Organization, Weapons, and Tactics of Ancient Near Eastern Armies. Grand Rapids: Kregel, 2013.

Servajean, Frederic. Quatre Etudes Sur La Bataille de Qadech. Université Paul Valéry (Montpellier III): Montpellier, 2012.

Shabbahy, Lisa. “Depictional Study of Chariot Use in New Kingdom Egypt,” in Chasing Chariots: Proceedings of the First International Chariot Conference, edited by André J. Veldmeijer and Salima Ikram, 191-202. Leiden: Sidestone Press, 2013.

Shaw, Ian. The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Spalinger, Anthony. “Egyptian Chariots Departing for War,” in Chasing Chariots: Proceedings of the First International Chariot Conference, edited by André J. Veldmeijer and Salima Ikram, 237-256. Leiden: Sidestone Press, 2013.

_________. War in Ancient Egypt: The New Kingdom. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.

Vidal, Jordi. “The Men of Arwad, Mercenaries of the Sea,” Bibliotheca Orientalis 65 No. 1/2. (2008): 6–16

Vita, Juan-Pablo. (2008) "Le char de guerre en Syrie et Palestine" in Abrahami, Ph. y Battini L. (eds) Les Armés du Proche-Orient ancien. Oxford, BAR, pp. 57-70.

__________. The Power of a Pair of War Chariots in the Late Bronze Age: On Letters RS 20.33 (Ugarit), BE 17 33a (Nippur), and EA 197 (Damascus region). (Larger Publication data not available).

Westbrook, Raymond., “Babylonian diplomacy in the Amarna Letters,” Journal of the American Oriental Society; (Jul-Sep 2000); 120: 3.

Wilkinson, Toby. The Rise and Fall of Ancient Egypt: The History of a Civilization from 3000 B.C. to Cleopatra. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2010.

Wilson, John A. The Culture of Ancient Egypt. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951.

Yadin, Yigael. The Art of Warfare in Biblical Lands: In the Light of Archaeological Study. New York: McGraw – Hill, 1963.

Youngblood, Ronald. The Amarna Correspondence of Rib-Hadda, Prince of Byblos (EA 68-96). Ph.D. diss., The Dropsie College, 1961.

Descargas

Publicado

2020-12-14

Cómo citar

“Send the Archers”: Archery’s Primary Role in Canaanite-Levantine Military Thought“Enviar a los arqueros”: el rol central de la arquería en el pensamiento militar cananeo-levantino. (2020). Revista Universitaria De Historia Militar, 9(19), 122-145. https://doi.org/10.53351/ruhm.v9i19.689

Artículos similares

1-10 de 11

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.